Our name says what we promise:
you get value quickly
We started RapidValue so that European organisations can govern the access of their people and their AI agents, understand it and keep it running. The product only has value when customers and partners can run it themselves.
How we mark our own work
- Access decisions get better
- Evidence is easier to defend
- Your team keeps the model up to date after the launch team has left
RapidValue succeeds when its customers and partners succeed
RapidValue succeeds when its customers and partners succeed
A long list of modules does not make a platform successful. We look at three things: whether access decisions get better, whether evidence is easier to defend, and whether the organisation can keep the model up to date after the launch team has left.
Six things we believe
We use these six beliefs to decide what belongs in RapidValue and how it should reach a customer.
Long implementations are a business model, and they can be avoided.
You should see value while your organisation is still learning. You should not have to wait through a year of design and services.
See the first-morning timeline →A product has to be maintainable.
The team that runs it must be able to understand, change and safely retire whatever an implementation creates.
See how the platform stays one model →Governance is more than ticking compliance boxes.
A control matters when it changes a decision and keeps evidence of what happened.
See the evidence by obligation →We sell the product and leave the implementation to others.
Partners and customers should be able to deliver without a large services team from the vendor.
See how partners deliver →Customers and partners steer the product.
The roadmap starts from problems that keep coming back in the field. We do not build to fill a feature matrix.
Talk to the founder →RapidValue is European in how it is built.
Ownership, hosting, data boundaries and deployment choices have to hold up in an architecture review.
Review the architecture →For some requirements another vendor is the better choice
Choose one of the large vendors if you need a global consultancy organisation, one supplier that runs the whole IAM programme, certifications RapidValue does not hold yet, or a vendor with a twenty-year track record as a procurement condition.
| RapidValue fits when | Choose a large vendor when |
|---|---|
| Time to first value matters more than global rollout scale | Global rollout scale is more important than time to first value |
| You want partners or your own team to own the implementation | You want the vendor to run the implementation |
| EU hosting and local credential custody are requirements | You need an assurance report or certification we do not hold yet |
| You prefer to switch on writes system by system | Procurement requires a large listed supplier |